Heretic: Copyright Law and Dramatic Works
Abstract
The production of the play Heretic in 1996 prompted a debate over copyright and the dramatic arts in Australia. The playwright David Williamson argued that the role of the writer was supreme. Although he was willing to acknowledge the contributions of other collaborators, the playwright did not believe that these interpreters deserved copyright protection. The director Wayne Harrison advocated a more collaborative vision of the performing arts. He believed that the role of the director and the position of the producer deserved greater legal recognition. Furthermore he was also willing to countenance limited rights for performers. This article argues that recognition should be accorded to all of the main collaborators in the performing arts. It contends that economic rights and moral rights should not be just limited to the writer, the director, and the producer, but they should extend to the performers and the designers.
Published
Jun 1, 2002
How to Cite
RIMMER, Matthew.
Heretic: Copyright Law and Dramatic Works.
QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 1, june 2002.
ISSN 2201-7275.
Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/95>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v2i1.95.
Section
Emerging Scholars' Section
Since 2015-12-04
Abstract Views
1783
PDF Views
1816
Until 2015-12-04:
Abstract Views
710
PDF Views
1388
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.