Neutrality in Mediation: A Study of Mediator Perceptions
AbstractNeutrality is arguably no longer an uncontested founding principle for the practice ofmediation since both academic studies and practice reflections have found it to be absent in practice. The aim of the research reported here was to explore meaningful constructions of the concept of neutrality through an examination of the actual experience of mediators. The central question was: how do mediators make sense of neutrality in practice? The most important finding is the emphasis placed by participants on the principle of party self-determination in their attempts to deal with the dilemmas of neutrality. This finding is important because it points to the development of an alternative conception of neutrality, one that abandons neutrality in an absolute sense, but reframes its meaning in relation to that of party selfdetermination.An alternative discourse for understanding mediator neutrality based on this finding and incorporating a postmodern construction of power is advanced in this paper.
Jun 30, 2008
How to Cite
DOUGLAS, Susan. Neutrality in Mediation: A Study of Mediator Perceptions. QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 1, june 2008. ISSN 2201-7275. Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/88>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v8i1.88.
Articles - General Issue
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.