Confronting the Reality of Casualisation in Australia:Valuing Sessional Staff in Law Schools
Abstract
Casualisation of academic staff in universities and law schools is a reality. It is argued that sessional academics in law schools are atypical of sessionals across the sector and need training, resourcing and encouragement, which value their particular contribution and worth. The creation of a more specific program at the school level is described, and it is argued to be effective as it assists sessional academics to engage with the students thereby improving the quality of student learning and enhancing the experience for these academics. Adopting a one-size-fits-all program at the institutional level may be cost effective, but is less likely to achieve this aim.
Published
Oct 1, 2010
How to Cite
COWLEY, Jill.
Confronting the Reality of Casualisation in Australia:Valuing Sessional Staff in Law Schools.
QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, oct. 2010.
ISSN 2201-7275.
Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/8>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v10i1.8.
Section
Articles - General Issue
Since 2015-12-04
Abstract Views
2813
PDF Views
1821
Until 2015-12-04:
Abstract Views
854
PDF Views
1239
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.