Sentencing Aboriginal Offenders: Recognising Disadvantage and the Intergenerational Impacts of Colonisation
Abstract
The ongoing issue of Aboriginal disadvantage, particularly the overrepresentation of Aboriginal people in Australian prisons warrants a change in sentencing practices and outcomes. There is a current failure by Australian Courts to properly account for the systemic disadvantage suffered by Aboriginal Australians during the sentencing process. Given the intergenerational impacts of colonisation and an arguable new generation of institutionalised Aboriginal children, consideration of the effects of colonisation is still largely relevant today. The High Court in Bugmy v The Queen[1] and Munda v Western Australia[2] have provided little assistance, however the law in Canada could assist Australian courts when it comes to sentencing Aboriginal offenders.
[1] Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 302 ALR 192.
[2] Munda v Western Australia (2013) 302 ALR 207.
Keywords
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.