Rethinking Restrictive Practices: A Comparative Analysis
AbstractThis paper undertakes the first comparative analysis of restrictive practices legislation in Australia. This legislation, which regulates practices used to manage ‘challenging behaviours’ of people with intellectual disability or cognitive impairment, currently exists in four Australian jurisdictions. The paper demonstrates the gaps in coverage of this legislation and the wide variation of law nationally. We argue that legislation governing restrictive practices is needed, it should regulate the provision of all restrictive practices (not just some) and that there should be a national consistent approach.
Dec 17, 2014
How to Cite
CHANDLER, Kim; WILLMOTT, Lindy; WHITE, Ben. Rethinking Restrictive Practices: A Comparative Analysis. QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 2, dec. 2014. ISSN 2201-7275. Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/568>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v14i2.568.
Articles - General Issue
Restrictive practices; intellectual disability; behaviours of concern
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.