Advance Health Directives: Competing Perceptions, Intentions And Use By Patients And Doctors In Queensland
AbstractThis paper reports on mixed method empirical research undertaken with individuals who have completed advance health directives (‘principals’) and doctors who have either attested to the principal’s capacity when the document was completed or been called upon to use these documents in clinical settings. Principals and doctors appear to have different understandings of the purpose of these documents and their role in decision-making about medical treatment. We recommend changes to the advance health directive form in Queensland to promote informed decision-making which will help to better align perceptions of principals and doctors about the role of these documents.
Sep 24, 2013
How to Cite
WILLMOTT, Lindy et al. Advance Health Directives: Competing Perceptions, Intentions And Use By Patients And Doctors In Queensland. QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 1, sep. 2013. ISSN 2201-7275. Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/532>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v13i1.532.
Articles - General Issue
advance health directives, guardianship
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.