Australian Crime Commission V Stoddart: The End of Common Law Spousal Privilege
AbstractIn Australian Crime Commission v Stoddart (2011) 282 ALR 620 the High Court held that a privilege against spousal incrimination does not exist at common law. This means that at common law a spouse can no longer invoke a privilege to refuse to answer a question, the answer to which may risk incriminating her or his spouse. This case note provides a brief outline of the key issue and the case, and an in-depth summary of the three High Court judgments. Finally, a short comment on the significance of the decision is provided, as well as an argument that the Court should have considered the policy justification behind the supposed privilege before deciding not to recognise it.
Oct 19, 2012
How to Cite
FEARIS, Edward. Australian Crime Commission V Stoddart: The End of Common Law Spousal Privilege. QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 2, oct. 2012. ISSN 2201-7275. Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/492>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v12i2.492.
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.