Indigenous Australians and Dugongs in the Southern Great Barrier Reef: Legal Remedies
Abstract
mammal, in Australian waters over the last decade, has prompted the Commonwealth and Queensland Governments to undertake a series of conservation measures. The measures are commendable on their environmental merits, but the conservation effort arguably diminishes the rights of coastal Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders, who have extensive interests in dugongs and their protection. Government recognition of these interests is gradually increasing, through the mediation of broader native title claims and the negotiation of agreements for collaborative management. The focus of this paper, however, is limited to conservation actions taken in the southern Great Barrier Reef, and whether selected domestic legal remedies can redress losses suffered by Indigenous peoples. This focus reflects the concerns of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations in Queensland, about denial of access to dugong, inadequate management of dugong and the human impacts which threaten populations, and possible discrimination regarding compensation.
Published
Oct 30, 1998
How to Cite
LEONG, Eri.
Indigenous Australians and Dugongs in the Southern Great Barrier Reef: Legal Remedies.
QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 14, p. 108-142, oct. 1998.
ISSN 2201-7275.
Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/457>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v14i0.457.
Section
Articles - General Issue
Since 2015-12-04
Abstract Views
1617
PDF Views
2521
Until 2015-12-04:
Abstract Views
623
PDF Views
1558
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.