Statutory Demands - What Went Wrong
Abstract
This paper will focus on the changes to the statutory demand procedure, notably ss459G and 459J of the Act. It will discuss the changes, the interpretation of the changes in the courts and why, in practice, they have failed to achieve the reforms contemplated in the Harmer Report.
Published
Oct 30, 1997
How to Cite
CLIFF, Dale.
Statutory Demands - What Went Wrong.
QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 13, p. 53-81, oct. 1997.
ISSN 2201-7275.
Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/436>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v13i0.436.
Section
Articles - General Issue
Since 2015-12-04
Abstract Views
1555
PDF Views
2262
Until 2015-12-04:
Abstract Views
624
PDF Views
2293
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.