SECTION 22 UNCONSCIONABILITY - A SAUROPOD IN NEED OF LIFE SUPPORT
AbstractThe Full Federal Court decision in Allphones Retail Pty Ltd v Hoy Mobile Pty Ltd (2009) 178 FCR 57; ATPR ¶42-294 represents a step back towards an era where unconscionable conduct was not allowed to impinge on commercial certainty. Of the four judges who heard this matter three different approaches to the relationship of what is now s 22 of the Australian Consumer Law to s 243 were given. The paper concludes that the primary judge Rares J was the only one of the quartet who got it right. The other three approaches impose, using the criterion of causation, restrictive barriers on the operation of s 22 unconscionability. Regrettably, with the High Court refusing special leave to appeal and in the absence of any suitable test case to explore the parameters, s 22 remains underutilised and under threat of being cast in the same light as the sauropod – an assumption that it looms large in weight and height but in the absence of anyone sighting it, presumed extinct. For this reason, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is urged to identify an appropriate test case to explore the limits of s 22. If this is not done urgently, the present narrow, confining operation of the legislation will not only be out of step with Parliament’s intent, but positively moving in another direction.
Aug 29, 2011
How to Cite
GRIGGS, Lynden. SECTION 22 UNCONSCIONABILITY - A SAUROPOD IN NEED OF LIFE SUPPORT. QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, aug. 2011. ISSN 2201-7275. Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/4>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v11i1.4.
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.