A Discussion of 'Regret' as a Model for Ethical Disclosure Generally and in the Context of the Provision of Life Sustaining Measures in Queensland (or: 'Why are there no Ethical Child Prodigies?')
AbstractThe child prodigy has long been standard fare for human interest television shows: 5 year olds that play Mozart sonatas; 6 year olds that have memorized all the biographical details of every American president; and one memorable prodigy I particularly recall who, as a 4 year old, could recite in either chronological or alphabetical order all the Oscar winners for best male lead. But there is one notable omission from the pantheon of prodigies: to date there has not been an 8year old prodigy purporting to be a bioethicist.
Dec 1, 2006
How to Cite
SAYERS, Mark W.. A Discussion of 'Regret' as a Model for Ethical Disclosure Generally and in the Context of the Provision of Life Sustaining Measures in Queensland (or: 'Why are there no Ethical Child Prodigies?'). QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, dec. 2006. ISSN 2201-7275. Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/187>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v6i2.187.
Articles - General Issue
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.