RE Patrick & the Rights and Responsibilities of Sperm Donor Fathers in Australian Family Law

  • James McConvill
  • Eithne Mills

Abstract

In the matter of Re Patrick, Guest J of the Family Court of Australia held that a sperm donor, known to the lesbian mother of the child, had a right under Australian law to regular contact with the child to the extent that this was in the child's best interests. However, his Honour also held that due to the way in which particular provisions of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) are drafted, a sperm donor cannot be regarded as the "parent" of the child, and accordingly called for legislative reform to recognise the rights of known sperm donors wanting involvement with the child. In this article, the authors will first explore the facts and decision in Re Patrick, and then outline a proposal to amend the Family Law Act 1975 so that sperm donors can apply for an order to be a 'parent' under the Act.
Published
Dec 1, 2003
How to Cite
MCCONVILL, James; MILLS, Eithne. RE Patrick & the Rights and Responsibilities of Sperm Donor Fathers in Australian Family Law. QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, dec. 2003. ISSN 2201-7275. Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/161>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v3i2.161.
Section
Articles - General Issue
Since 2015-12-04
Abstract Views
1986
PDF Views
3167
Until 2015-12-04:
Abstract Views
1921
PDF Views
3421