Sentencing Principles in the High Court and the PSA
Abstract
This paper examines the significance of two recent decisions of the High Court of Australia for sentencing in Queensland: Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen on the role numerical guidelines can play in a scheme of discretionary sentencing; Cameron v The Queen on the conditions for granting or denying discounts for pleading guilty. Although neither decision involved a Queensland offence, they both expressed principles which can complement the loose terms of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld). There were also, however, some statements in Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen criticising 'two-stage' sentencing and condemning any use of numerical guidelines. It is argued that Queensland courts need not and should not follow these directions when sentencing under the Penalties and Sentences Act.
Published
Jun 1, 2003
How to Cite
COLVIN, Eric.
Sentencing Principles in the High Court and the PSA.
QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, june 2003.
ISSN 2201-7275.
Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/119>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v3i1.119.
Section
Articles - General Issue
Since 2015-12-04
Abstract Views
1617
PDF Views
2343
Until 2015-12-04:
Abstract Views
675
PDF Views
1106
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.