Killing the Goose and Keeping the Golden Nest Egg

  • Andrew Hemming

Abstract

This paper argues that statutes allowing judicial discretion in cases of manslaughter based on ‘the justice of the case’ have both skewed the outcome in favour of the killer
and added unnecessary complexity and uncertainty. It is contended that the better view is to abrogate the common law, which applies in all Australian jurisdictions apart from
New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), by substituting a codified solution (Parliament rather than judges being the appropriate body to balance
the public interest with the interests of individuals) which is designed to achieve greater fairness, improve the efficiency of the distribution of justice, provide a comprehensive solution involving other relevant legislation and reflect contemporary values within the Australian community. It is argued that any changes in this area of the law have complex and far reaching ramifications which not only cannot be accurately assessed on a case by case basis, but also risk leaving the law floundering in a quagmire of uncertainty.

Downloads

Total Abstract Views: 1434  Total PDF Downloads: 968

Published
Dec 1, 2008
How to Cite
HEMMING, Andrew. Killing the Goose and Keeping the Golden Nest Egg. QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 2, dec. 2008. ISSN 2201-7275. Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/47>. Date accessed: 27 june 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v8i2.47.
Section
Articles - General Issue
Since 2015-12-04
Abstract Views
1793
PDF Views
1499
Until 2015-12-04:
Abstract Views
731
PDF Views
1318