ADR — Argument for and Against Use of the Mediation Process Particularly in Family and Neighbourhood Disputes
Abstract
Alternative dispute resolution processes include negotiation, conciliation, mediation, mini-trials and arbitration. This paper, however, will focus on mediation and the advantages and disadvantages of its use, particularly in the fields of family and neighbourhood disputes because it is arguable that both in Australia and overseas, especially in the United States, mediation in these two areas is the most highly developed and has received the most academic study. In Australia eg., community justice uses mediation almost entirely.
Published
Dec 1, 1991
How to Cite
CLARKE, Gay R.; DAVIES, Iyla T..
ADR — Argument for and Against Use of the Mediation Process Particularly in Family and Neighbourhood Disputes.
QUT Law Review, [S.l.], v. 7, p. 81-96, dec. 1991.
ISSN 2201-7275.
Available at: <https://lr.law.qut.edu.au/article/view/343>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2021.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v7i0.343.
Section
Articles - General Issue
Since 2015-12-04
Abstract Views
3764
PDF Views
30566
Until 2015-12-04:
Abstract Views
1903
PDF Views
9905
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY). This is to achieve more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for authors.
